Determination of Added Mass and Inertia Moment of Marine Ships Moving in 6 Degrees of Freedom
Do Thanh Sen1, Tran Canh Vinh2
1Maritime Education and Human Resource Center (UT-STC), Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
2Faculty of Navigation, Ho Chi Minh City University of Transport, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
To cite this article:
Do Thanh Sen, Tran Canh Vinh. Determination of Added Mass and Inertia Moment of Marine Ships Moving in 6 Degrees of Freedom. International Journal of Transportation Engineering and Technology. Vol. 2, No. 1, 2016, pp. 8-14. doi: 10.11648/j.ijtet.20160201.12
Received: March 16, 2016; Accepted: March 30, 2016; Published: April 25, 2016
Abstract: When a ship moves in water with acceleration or deceleration, quantities of fluid moving around the hull creating additional hydrodynamic forces acting on the hull. It is imagined as the added mass which increases the total system mass and inertia moment. In order to establish the mathematical model for ship motion, the added components need to be determined. For a particular ship, these hydrodynamic components can be obtained by experiment. However, for ship simulation especially at the initial design stage it is necessary to calculate and estimate by theoretical method. This study aims to find out a general method to calculate all components of added mass and inertia moment in 6 degrees of freedom for simulating ship movement.
Keywords: Added Mass, Hydrodynamic Coefficient, Mathematical Modeling, Ship Simulation
According to potential flow theory, no force exists when a rigid body moves at a steady speed through ideal fluid. However, once it accelerates, an hydrodynamic force experiences proportionally to the acceleration. The hydrodynamic force (FH) can be described :
Where, is rigid-body velocity matrix in 6 degrees of freedom (6DOF) (see fig. 1 and table 1):
|1||surge - motion in x direction||u||Linear velocities|
|2||sway - motion in y direction||v|
|3||heave - motion in z direction||w|
|4||roll – rotation about the x axis||p||Angular velocities|
|5||pitch - rotation about the y axis||q|
|6||yaw - rotation about the z axis||r|
M is system inertia matrix of the rigid body and added mass. When a ship accelerates or decelerates on water, quantities of surrounding water moving together with the hull increase the system inertia matrix:
Where MS is mass and inertia moment matrix of the ship which is derived:
MA is added mass and added inertia moment matrix. Assuming that mij is a component in the ith direction caused by acceleration in direction j. It is defined as hydrodynamic force due to unit acceleration and consists of 36 components:
Added mass was first introduced by Dubua in 1776  then was expressed mathematically and exactly by Green in 1883 and Stokes in 1843  by expression of added mass of a sphere. Later many researchers generalized the notion of added mass to an arbitrary body moving in different regimes .
In the past, there were many studies determining the added mass including experiment and theoretical prediction.
For a particular ship, it can be obtained by experimental method. However, the experimental method is limited and cannot solve all added mass components. For simulating the ship motion especially in initial design stage, M has to be calculated by estimation method.
The principal for calculating of added mass is based on work of Ursell in 1949  and Frank in 1967  for arbitrary symmetric cross section. Then Keil introduced method for any arbitrary water depth based on a variation of the method of Ursell with Lewis conformal mapping in 1974 . In 1967, Frank described the pulsating source method for deep water .
Nils Salvesen, E. O. Tuck and Odd Faltisen introduced new method to predict heave, pitch, sway, roll and yaw motions as well as wave-induced vertical and horizontal shear forces, bending moments, and torsional moments for a ship advancing at constant speed with arbitrary heading in regular waves in 1970 .
Previous studies showed that mij could not be determined by a unique method. A total way to determine all components of added mass and added moment of inertia is necessary. It is suggested to combine some methods to determine all the remaining components. This study aims to generalize and propose an optimal combination of different methods to calculate total components of the added mass matrix with computer.
2. Methods to Determine Added Mass
2.1. Elimination of Added Mass Components Due to Symmetry of Ship Hull and Added Mass Matrix
With marine ships, the body is symmetric on port-starboard (xy plane), it can be concluded that vertical motions due to heave and pitch induce no transversal force:
m32 = m34 = m36 = m52 = m54 = m56 = 0.
Due to the symmetry of the added mass matrix, it can concluded that mij = mji,:
m23 = m43 = m63 = m25 = m45 = m65 = 0.
The same consideration is applied for the longitudinal motions caused by acceleration in direction j = 2, 4, 6:
m12 = m14 = m16 = 0, and
m21 = m41 = m61 = 0
Thus, for a ship moving in 6DOF, 36 components of added mass are reduced to 18:
The problem is to determine all remaining components of the matrix MA by predictive method.
2.2. Method of Equivalent Ellipsoid
Basing on theory of kinetic energy of fluid mij is determined from the formula:
Where S is the wetted ship area, r is water density, is potentials of the flow when the ship is moving in ithdirection with unit speed. Potentials satisfy the Laplace equation .
To calculate mij, the ship can be relatively assumed as a 3D body such as sphere, spheroid, ellipsoid, rectangular, cylinder etc. (fig. 2)
With a marine ship, the most representative of the hull is elongated ellipsoid with c/b = 1 and r = a/b. Where a, b are semi axis of the ellipsoid. Basing on theory of hydrostatics, m11, m22, m33, m44, m55, m66 can be described , :
For simplifying the calculation, each component can be represented by correspondent kij called hydrodynamic coefficient.
d and L are maximum diameter and length overall. Inertia moment of the displaced water is approximately the moment of inertia of the equivalent ellipsoid:
The limitation of this method is that the calculating result is only an approximation. The more equivalent to the elongated ellipsoid it is, the more accurate the result is obtained. Moreover, this method cannot determine component m24; m26, m35; m44, m15 and m51.
2.3. Strip Theory Method
The ''Ordinary Strip Theory Method" was introduced by Korvin-Kroukovsky and Jacobs in 1957. Then it was developed by Tasai in 1969 with a "Modified Strip Theory Method" .
Basing on this method a ship can be made up of a finite number of transversal 2D slices (fig. 3). Each slice has a form closely resembling the segment of the representative ship and its added mass can be easily calculated. The added mass of the whole ship is obtained by integration of the 2D value over the length of the hull. Components are determined:
Where mij(x) is added mass of 2D cross section at location xs.
Lewis transformation mapping:
In practice the form of each slice is various and complex. For numbering and calculating in computer Lewis transformation is the most proper solution.
and the unit semicircle is derived:
Where ; . By substituting into the formula (2.15), descriptive parameters of a cross section can be obtained:
Where B(x), T(x) are the breadth and draft of the cross section s. Parameter p, q are described by means of the ratio H(x) and β(x).
Parameter θ is physical meaningless. It corresponds to the polar angle of given point prior to conformal transformation from a semicircle: π/2 ≥ θ ≥ -π/2.
The component of each section is determined by formulas:
Then, total is calculated:
Where , are corrections related to fluid motion along x-axis due to elongation of the body . is correction for the added mass which can be used the Pabst correction as the most well-known experimental correction:
is correction for the added moment of inertia using the theoretical formula:
To have a section accepted for Lewis forms, the area coefficient is bounded by a lower limit to omit re-entrant Lewis forms and by an upper limit to omit asymmetric Lewis forms:
For H(x) ≥ 1.0:
For H(x) ≤ 1.0:
2.4. Determining Remaining Added Mass
It is understandable that are relatively small in comparison with total added mass and can be ignored. Thus, .
The Ellipsoid and Strip theory methods do not determine component m15. It is approximately considered that the component m15 and m24 are caused by the hydrodynamic force due to m11 and m22 with the force center at the center of buoyancy of the hull ZB . Therefore:
Thus, the formula to calculate m15 and m51 is obtained:
When m24 and m42 can be obtained by the Strip theory method.
3. Calculation and Assessment
• L: 170.0m
• B: 22.8m
• T: 9.3m
• Displacement: 20.876 MT
The ship is divided longitudinally into 20 slices with ratio B(x)/2T(x) and A(x)/B(x) as in table 2:
Numbering values of mapping are calculated and displayed in curves on computer in figure 6, 7 and 8. The results indicate that the transformation is relatively proper in comparison with the actual forms.
The calculating results of above suggested methods and experimental data are summed up and presented in table 3. The column "proposed" is the value suggested for application.
Basing on the above results, it is concluded that Strip theory method with Lewis forms can determine most component mij with high accuracy due to equivalent transformation. However, this method cannot determine component m11, m55 which can be solved by considering the ship as an elongated ellipsoid.
As for the component m15 = m51, this value is not so high, the estimation in the formula (2.54) is satisfied and acceptable.
All components of added mass and added moment of inertia can be calculated by combination of different methods. This study suggests a method to determine all components mij of the added mass matrix as in table 4 below:
(*) determined by assuming the ship as an equivalent elongated ellipsoid.
(**) determined by "Strip theory" with Lewis transformation.
(***) determined by formula (2.54).
(****) can be ignored.
In order to determine added mass and added moment of inertia, various methods are necessary to use for particular groups of component mij. The suggested combination method can determine all mij necessary to establish the mathematical model for motion of marine ships in 6DOFs used for computerizing simulation especially at the initial design stage.
However, for a hull with port-starboard asymmetry or re-entrant forms the Lewis shape of ship frame is inapplicable, further assessment for proper calculation should be taken into consideration for obtaining satisfied results.
Do Thanh Sen (1972, Ha Noi), Master Mariner; Attorney at law. He currently is a navigation lecturer and has been conducting many projects in Bridge simulator training, Maritime consultancy and applied research at the Maritime Education and Human Resource center as a member of STC-Group, the Netherlands. His research interests are Ship mathematical modelling, Marine simulators, Maritime education, IT and Maritime law. He authored 2 books, 7 publications in scientific papers and 3 maritime computer applications.
Tran Canh Vinh (1951, Nghe An), PhD Thesis on speciality of Control of technical systems (1999, Russia), Associate Prof. in 2005. He is currently Senior Lecturer in Ho Chi Minh City University of Transport (Vietnam) in Automation control, Electronic navigation aids. His research interest includes Control of ships and Electronic navigation. He has authored 3 books and 30 publications in scientific papers and many presentations on national and international conferences.